Posts Tagged ‘lease’
|Where did I put that lease? Finding your best real estate strategy
Wednesday, January 4th, 2012
By Ralph Benzakein, Vice President
Here’s the scenario: You just realized that your lease will be expiring in a few months and you start to think about what that will mean. For the most part, your current space works for you. You might need more open space or a couple of additional offices; the carpet is starting to show some wear; the walls have been marked up a bit. But, it’s close to home and you have a comfort level there (the car practically drives itself to the office). You also remember the nightmare of moving and the disruption to your business.
So…now what? You didn’t get into business to have to worry about this stuff, but now you need to. You decide there is plenty of time to address this and go about doing “more important” things.
At the same time, you begin to notice all of the “Available Space” signs on your way to and from your office. You call one or two of them and discover that although there is a sign in front of the building, there isn’t necessarily any space that would suite your operation, but the broker representing the building would be happy to show you other buildings. It then occurs to you that those signs never really come down and that they are really just a lead generation system for the broker.
More time goes by and brokers are calling you every other day to pitch you new space or tell you how much free rent they can get you. Nobody has taken the time to evaluate what your business needs are and how they can be aligned with your real estate needs.
It all becomes a little overwhelming and with about 30 days left on your lease, you contact you current landlord and “ask” him if you can renew your lease. He says, “Sure, I’ll send you a renewal letter, just sign it and you’ll be good for the next five years.”
Wow, talk about the path of least resistance. You think to yourself, done deal. You read the lease renewal, notice the part about continued escalations (seems reasonable), sign it, and it goes back in the drawer for another four and a half years.
You, my friend, are a landlord’s dream come true!
You may have saved some time, but it came at a very high price. Here are just a few of the items that a tenant rep would have negotiated for you:
- Lower rent (those continued escalations in the renewal have committed you to rent that is well above the market)
- Rent abatement (free rent)
- Refurbishment allowance (new carpets, paint, move partition walls, etc.)
- New base year for real estate taxes
- Reduce or enlarge space, per your needs
- Lower escalations
Your rationale that your landlord would not want a broker involved is accurate. I’ve just shown you why. It’s not because he doesn’t want to pay a broker’s fee, though he probably doesn’t. It’s because many of the countless clauses you are not equipped to negotiate are his profit centers.
And by the way, some landlords are more than willing to pay a broker’s fee, even on the renewal. Some even insist on it to ensure that the broker is not motivated to move the tenant out of their current space.
Bottom line: give yourself plenty of time to determine the best real estate strategy for your business. That usually means at least one year, if not more, depending on the size of your space.
Tags: corporate real estate, cost savings, landlord, lease, tenant
Posted in Transaction Management | Comments Off
Audit or Administration? Providing Value to Smaller Spaces
Wednesday, June 8th, 2011
By Jeff Tosello, Principal
Choosing a boutique firm to audit your company’s largest leases at the lowest possible contingency fee you can negotiate—isn’t that all you need to do to ensure that your portfolio is protected?
In a word: no. You may be missing one of the greatest potential sources of cost reduction in the real estate department and passing up an opportunity to be a hero not only to the business unit with the largest amount of space, but to the smaller space users as well.
Often, lease audit is a phrase used to raise questions and entice tenants into discussions about representation. It can also mean many different things—a desktop review, an exhaustive desktop analysis, an onsite review of the landlord’s books and/or extended discussion with the landlord over any number of gray areas open to interpretation in the lease where expenses are involved. Many times, what a tenant thinks they’re going to get is not what the contingency firms actually do, and as a result, they end up paying too much to have the work done. Understanding the nuances of this business and considering a more specific approach to expense review may influence how a company proceeds with this type of program.
Used properly, lease audit is an effective means of resolving past issues and, more importantly, of ensuring compliant lease payments in the future. But the type of audits employed and how they are applied to the portfolio of locations is a big part of the equation. Further, implementing procedural changes in the payment process after audits are performed can increase the benefit of such a review exponentially.
Looking at a real-life example, let us suppose that we are considering a company with 50 locations in the US making up 1,000,000 SF and having an average size of 20,000 SF. A closer look at this portfolio reveals the following (using the old 80/20 rule):
Assumptions:
-1,000,000 SF portfolio (average = 20,000), 50 locations
-80% of the portfolio averages 8,750 SF
-20% of the portfolio averages 65,000 SF
-Of the 10 locations that make up the 65,000 SF average, only 3 are above 40,000 SF
-Average cost per square foot = $30 (base rent plus OPEX and taxes)
-Ratio of basic errors to complex errors = 1% vs. 2.5%
| Factors | Conventional Approach | Our Approach | Net Difference |
| # of Leases to Audit | 3 for 195,000 SF | 50 for 1M SF | 47 |
| Basic Errors Found on All Leases (1%) | $58,500 | $300,000 | $241,500 |
| Complex Errors on Big Leases (2.5%) | $146,250 | $146,250 | $0 |
| Total Savings = | $204,750 | $446,250 | $241,500 |
| Cost of Auditing Just 3 = | $71,663 | Flat fees of $900 + % of $51,188 = $52,087 | ($19,575) |
| Cost of Auditing the Balance | $0 | $14,100 | $14,100 |
| Net Savings to Client = | $133,087 | $380,063 | $246,975 |
As you can see from this example, avoiding review of the small locations leaves $250,000 on the table even assuming a 1% error rate! Pure audit firms won’t touch these because a 1% savings at a 2,500 SF location means saving about $750, netting them only $263 which is less than their cost of doing the work.
The bottom line: Higher value, more savings, better results – Isn’t that what wins business?
Tags: corporate real estate, cost savings, landlord, lease, lease audit, tenant
Posted in Lease Administration | Comments Off
Accounting Boards Come Full Circle
Wednesday, June 1st, 2011
By Brant Bryan, Principal
If you are into accounting, this is high drama.
After lengthy debate, the US and International Accounting Boards (the FASB and IASB) tentatively decided in their May meeting to have all leases accounted for as a financing lease. This reversed their decision earlier this Spring which would have provided an additional classification allowing some leases to be accounted for on a straight line basis. The Board decided that it is less complex, overall, for all leases to be accounted for through a single approach.
What does this mean for tenants? ON A TENTATIVE BASIS, here are some highlights:
-All lessees will reflect a front-loaded pattern of expenses. Expense will be a combination of interest expense and an amortization of the recorded asset. Higher interest expense will be charged during the early periods of a lease.
-All leases will be capitalized and added to the balance sheet as an asset and a liability.
-All measurements will be made as of the lease commencement date.
-At the beginning of a lease, tenants will determine if they have significant economic incentive to exercise options for renewal, expansion, purchase, etc. If there is such incentive, the options shall be included in the measurement of lease asset and liability.
-Reassessment of lease options will only be required when there is a significant change in economic incentive. Market based factors will not be considered in reassessments.
-The discount rate used in determined lease liability or asset value will only be revised when there is a reassessment caused by a change in economic incentive to exercise options.
-The Boards did not reach a consensus on whether there will be one or two models for lessor accounting, and thus that is still an open item.
-The Boards expect to complete the lease project by the end of 2011. Implementation will likely begin in 2013 or 2014.
As the Boards reach more decisions and release more information, we will let you know what is being said and what this might mean for tenants.
Tags: corporate real estate, FASB, lease, tenant
Posted in Capital Markets | Comments Off
Tenants Start with Project Management, Finish with Big Savings
Thursday, March 24th, 2011
By Dwight Patten, Director of Project Management
While the recovery slowly continues, it continues to be a tenant’s market, and cost-conscious companies are finding opportunities to save that go beyond reduced rental rates. Whether companies are upgrading or renovating existing space or building out new space, many are discovering that they can realize significant additional savings—in some cases more than $1 million. How? By adapting upfront, value-added Project Management.
Project Management—often overlooked and misunderstood—is a process that oversees all components of commercial real estate projects following strategic and portfolio planning. It involves managing all the elements that help you optimize your space needs, align your real estate with your business plan, and improve your bottom line.
To maximize savings, you should engage a Project Manager before the lease signing. Typically, the Project Management sequence includes the following steps:
-Lease negotiation (right-sizing space, maximizing tenant improvements, ensuring on-time project completion)
-Needs analysis and project objectives
-Vendor selection (architects, engineers, general contractor, IT, furniture)
-Design planning and space programming
-Construction control
-Move-in coordination
The right Project Manager orchestrates the whole process (including measures to “green up” your office, as needed), ensuring that your project comes in on time and on budget.
What Are the Benefits?
As far as cost savings, we have found that tenants will save at least the cost of the Project Manager by the project’s completion. One way Project Managers can guarantee savings is by leveraging relationships with vendors who want to work with them. For instance, they can drive 70% price reductions from furniture manufacturers alone.
Beyond cost savings, they will help you mitigate risks and minimize your time and stress. And additional benefits continue long term as space upgrades often lead to improved employee productivity and morale. For instance, through space reconfiguration, you can avoid empty pockets of vacant space, bring employees closer together, and establish a more collaborative environment. Sustainable practices will also produce a healthier workplace—and they are proving to help companies be more competitive, enhance recruitment efforts, and not necessarily cost additional “green.”
Overall, alternative work optimization strategies such as space restacking are now particularly timely as a new generation of younger employees are benefiting from new technologies, working in virtual areas, and sharing space at the office.
How to Proceed?
Meet with a project manager and real estate advisor who can integrate all your real estate needs, objectively arrive at a consensus, and represent your best interests. And remember to put project management to work before the deal is done.
Think of project management as an insurance policy that gives you peace-of-mind. The right team will provide a single source of accountability with professionals who will navigate around potential pitfalls and squeeze savings every step of the way.
Whatever the economic climate you should consider engaging an experienced, knowledgeable Project Manager who will plan intelligently and deliver as promised.
Tags: corporate real estate, cost savings, lease, PM, tenant
Posted in Project Management | Comments Off
Changes in Lease Accounting Simplified
Wednesday, March 16th, 2011
By Brant Bryan, Principal
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) tentatively agreed to revise some of the proposed lease accounting standards. Nearly 800 letters and comments had been sent to the Boards in response to the proposed changes, and as a result, the Boards are simplifying portions of the new lease standards. However, the Boards remain firmly committed to requiring that all leases be recognized on the balance sheet.
What Has Changed?
The tentative changes from the initial Exposure Draft that will have the biggest impact to corporate tenants are:
-Defining Lease Term as the base term plus only option periods for which there is significant economic incentive to extend.
-Leases with variable lease payments (such as percentage or contingent rent) will have a threshold for inclusion in lessee’s lease liability and asset.
-Creating two classifications of leases: (1) Finance Leases and (2) Other-Than-Finance Leases.
-Affirming the direction of the Exposure Draft to require all leases to be reflected on the balance sheet as both an asset and a liability.
What Are the Specifics of the Changes?
In a significant change from the Exposure Draft, the Boards decided that all lease terms will be the contractual minimum period plus any optional renewal periods for which an exercise of the renewal option is reasonably certain. Reasonable certainty will be based solely on economic factors within the lease, such as bargain pricing on renewals. The Board plans to provide specific criteria to be used in this assessment. These tests likely will be very similar to the current GAAP standard concerning renewals. The ED had proposed including renewal terms if they were more-likely-than-not to occur based on a wide variety of factors, including lessee past practice, market conditions, and lessee intent.
One change that will greatly simplify life for corporate lessees is that there will be fewer reassessments of renewal options during the lease term than the Exposure Draft had proposed. Reassessments will only need to occur when economic factors affecting the decision to extend or terminate a lease change significantly. Lessees will not need to search for reassessment events.
The Boards also decided that variable lease payments tied to an index or rate would be included in lease calculations using the current rate, or spot market, for that index or rate, rather than a forward projection. There will also be thresholds for including contingent rents in leases (such as percentage of sales). Such contingent payments will only be included when they are virtually certain. If variable payments are, in substance, minimum lease payments, they shall be included based on such minimum.
There were also discussions regarding several other issues, including: which agreements shall be defined as a Lease, Residual Value Guarantees, and Lessor Accounting.
Two Types of Leases:
In another significant change from the Exposure Draft, the Boards tentatively decided there will be two classifications for leases, and each type will have a different pattern of recognition in an income statement. All leases will either be a (1) Finance lease or (2) Other-Than-Finance Lease. The Boards will develop criteria for distinguishing between these two types of leases.
A finance lease will be viewed as a financing transaction. The pattern of income for a finance lease will be consistent with the methodology presented in the Exposure Draft as it will be treated as a financing, with more expense early in the lease term. If the lease is similar to a rental transaction and financing is not considered to be a significant part of the transaction, the lease will be treated as an Other-Than-Finance Lease. The pattern of income for an Other-Than-Finance Lease will be consistent with current US GAAP (straight lined or leveled).
What Is Next?
Deliberations will continue, and other changes may be forthcoming before a final lease accounting standard is issued. June 30, 2011 is still the target date for finalizing the new standards. The exact schedule for formal adoption of the new standards has not been set; however, most observers expect larger corporations to begin reporting under the new standards with their 2012 fiscal year-end.
Tags: corporate real estate, Exposure Draft, FASB, IASB, lease, lease accounting
Posted in Capital Markets | Comments Off
OPEX: The Hidden Costs, Part II
Friday, February 18th, 2011
By Jason Jones and Kathy Burke, Principals
In Part I, we gave an overview of operating expenses—what they are, what tenants should know about them, and when tenants should be concerned about an operating expense statement from their landlord. In Part II, we will continue the discussion.
The following issues are often predictive of errors and overcharges:
-Substantial capital improvements made within the past year. If improvements have been made to the building during the year, pay very close attention to make sure that the treatment of your operating expenses is recorded according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For instance, if a new roof is put on the building, or if the lobby was renovated, these types of expenses should be capitalized and, in the case of most leases, excluded from the operating costs charged to tenants.
-Transfer of the property to a new entity. New owners will often implement their own accounting practices and methodologies. In the event of a refinance or sale, it is not uncommon to experience significant clerical mistakes made because the new owner did not properly read your lease.
-Increased vacancy in the building. Vacancy frequently leads to errors and overcharges as a result of the landlord’s process of extrapolating the building’s expenses to reflect what they would have been at full occupancy (commonly referred to as a “gross up”).
What can tenants do to mitigate expenses?
Since you do not control the operation of the building, you need to rely on the professional expertise of the landlord. The items that a tenant can control are typically limited to your HVAC and electric consumption. Keeping thermostats at a reasonable temperature and turning off lights or, better yet, having light sensors installed can help.
Another way to mitigate your expenses is to have a well-negotiated lease document with the right to audit operating expenses. Without this right, you have limited recourse should expenses escalate rapidly.
Many companies perform annual audits as a matter of business practice. This practice alerts everyone that attention is being paid to this issue and increases the level of accuracy. Historically, 80 percent of reconciliation statements contain items that require further clarification, with 25 percent of those statements material enough to warrant an in-depth audit.
What should you ask for from your landlord?
The landlord should be able to provide documentation confirming what was budgeted as well as the actual expenses incurred. This documentation should include a detailed line-item statement with an explanation, by account, of the actual versus budgeted expenses.
It is not unreasonable for the tenant to request at least two prior years’ worth of history, if you have had the same landlord or property manager. This historical data will help you ascertain the validity of the charges, category by category.
Tags: corporate real estate, landlord, lease, opex, tenant
Posted in Transaction Management | Comments Off
OPEX: The Hidden Costs, Part I
Wednesday, February 16th, 2011
By Jason Jones and Kathy Burke, Principals
Much like a residential home, commercial office buildings experience normal operating expenses (OPEX) such as taxes, utilities, and ongoing maintenance charges. And, as is the case with a home, the occupant is billed for these expenses on a monthly basis.
Every year, landlords provide tenants with their annual operating expense reconciliation statements. This statement is basically a “true-up” of the actual costs incurred by the landlord versus the costs budgeted and already paid by the tenant. When you receive this document, it would be worthwhile to take a closer look to confirm whether or not the charges are appropriate.
In spite of everyone’s best efforts, there are often mistakes within these documents. Aside from mathematical errors, it’s important to realize most landlords issue their reconciliations based upon the “standard” lease, and your lease may deviate from that standard.
What should tenants know?
A well-negotiated lease document will clearly define allowable operating expenses, detail proper accounting treatment, and specify which costs are not allowed to be charged to the tenant. Typically, “operating costs” include your real estate taxes, cleaning, common area maintenance, building insurance, management fees, and repairs that had to be done during the year.
In practice, your landlord will estimate property expenses for the upcoming calendar year. Tenants pay their percentage share each month throughout the year, based on the budgeted amount. At the end of the year, the actual expenditures are calculated, and during the first quarter of the following year, the landlord will deliver an annual reconciliation statement. Over the course of the lease, these adjusted operating expenses can become a significant expense that should, at the very least, be reviewed and justified. Note that there is enough gray area in calculating operating expenses that entire businesses exist just for the purpose of auditing these costs for tenants.
When should tenants be concerned?
If the expense numbers appear excessive, you should ask your landlord for an explanation, subsequently following up with your real estate adviser to confirm whether or not they are consistent with the market.
Often, the best way to ensure accuracy is to request that your real estate advisor perform a “desk-top” audit. The first indicator of a billing error is an excessive percentage increase from your last year’s operating expense statement. Note that with the exception of taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs, and maintenance (based on the age of your building), it is customary for most categories of operating expenses to escalate less than 5 percent per year. Anything beyond this number requires further clarification. If you reach a double-digit number, an explanation is due.
Stay tuned for Part II, where we will discuss issues to look out for, what tenants can do to mitigate expenses, and what tenants should ask their landlord for.
Tags: corporate real estate, landlord, lease, opex, tenant
Posted in Transaction Management | Comments Off
Forewarned is Forearmed: Read Your Lease
Wednesday, November 17th, 2010
By Darren Fleming
It may seem like simple advice, but reading their lease is something that a disturbing amount of tenants just do not take the time to do prior to signing, or resigning, their office lease. In fact many of our clients are not the same person who handled the last transaction on behalf of their organization. As a result, they do not possess any of the historical context that was at play five or ten years ago when the current contract was signed.
That’s why it is so important that before any action is taken that you read the lease – thoroughly. This means cover-to-cover, all the schedules, and any amendments that might have been made. Take notes and call an expert you trust if you have questions. There are potentially many hidden costs in a commercial lease and several of them come into play only at the end of the contract. So before you decide to talk to your landlord you had better be up to speed on your rights and obligations in order to avoid any nasty surprises. In this entry I will discuss two of the more common lease clauses I have seen that can cause problems and offer some tips and strategies to deal with them.
Protect your option to renew
The majority of tenants do not understand the purpose of an option to renew, or why it is a must-have in any lease. These clauses, which usually carry a requirement to give the landlord six or nine months’ advance written notice if they are to be exercised, are not just there to provide a reminder to talk to the landlord. Their sole purpose is to prevent a landlord from leasing your space out from under you in the event a more attractive tenant comes their way.
You may have spent major dollars retrofitting your 5,000 SF office when you moved in five years ago, only to have the property’s anchor tenant negotiate to take your beautiful space should you forget to exercise your option to renew. That is why it is essential to be aware of your notice obligations at all times. If you miss your notice window you have likely lost the option forever.
Restoration/reinstatement obligations
Unbeknownst to most tenants is that at the end of the lease term most standard commercial leases require a departing tenant to return a space back to its base building condition. This usually means bare concrete floors and the demolition of all interior walls. In most cases the landlord also has the right to insist on doing the work on the departing tenant’s behalf and all at the tenant’s expense. What’s worse is that many leases state that even if you were not the one who did the construction in the first place, you can still be on the hook for the removal. This particularly nasty surprise can be hard to spot and if you suspect you might have this type of clause in your lease, call an expert for advice on how to handle it.
Many uninformed tenants have had their negotiating leverage eliminated in one stroke when informed by their existing landlord that they would be charged thousands of dollars should they fail to renew their lease and leave. In some cases a tenant may then find themselves in the position of being unable to move and they typically renew at a higher rental rate than they might otherwise have been able to negotiate. The best defense is of course to strike this clause from the document before you sign but since time travel isn’t an option, when faced with a potential restoration obligation, you will likely have to get creative to avoid writing a big check.
It is vital to ensure you are aware of any potential pitfalls in your lease that could affect your company at the end of the term. Failure to do your homework and take preventative steps will undoubtedly cost you money. Forewarned is forearmed.
Tags: corporate real estate, landlord, lease
Posted in Transaction Management | Comments Off

