Archive for December, 2010

|

Sustainability: Global Trends that Affect Real Estate

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

By Mike Tobin, Director of Sustainability

Can one summarize all of the 2010 issues and events that will affect sustainable real estate practices in 2011 and beyond?  Probably, but it would not fit into this blog post. I will attempt to highlight a few key events/issues that have, and will continue to have, an impact on real estate and hope that others will add their thoughts. 

I.  Greenhouse Gas Regulation

The government did not enact comprehensive greenhouse gas regulation legislation, which forces the EPA to begin addressing the issue through the Clean Air Act. 

II.  Climate Change Disclosure

The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) requires disclosure of the impact of climate change as a business risk to companies.

III.  Global CEO Study on Sustainability

This summer, the UN Global Compact–Accenture CEO Study 2010 that surveyed more than 750 global CEOs on sustainability was released.  The results indicate that sustainability is and will continue to be a major focus for business success in the future.  A few key findings:

-93% of CEOs surveyed see sustainability as important to the future success of their businesses.

-96% believe that sustainability issues should be fully integrated into the strategy and operations of a company (up from 72% in 2007).

-91% report that their company will employ new technologies (e.g. renewable energy, energy efficiency, and information and communication technologies) to address sustainability issues over the next five years.

-72% cite “strengthening brand, trust, and reputation” as the strongest motivator for taking action on sustainability.

-49% cite complexity of implementation across functions as the most significant barrier to implementing an integrated, company-wide approach to sustainability.

A more detailed look at some of the results can be seen in Figures 1-3 and 2-1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV.  United Nations Annual Climate Conference in Cancun, Mexico

The United Nations held their annual Climate Conference in late 2010 to build upon the international environmental treaty known as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC).  This treaty was originally created at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), informally known as the Earth Summit, held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.  The objective of the treaty is to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.  As of December 2009, the treaty had 192 signatory countries.

The meeting in Cancun is being summarized by the Cancun Agreements which some say make good progress toward achieving global support of reducing global GHG emissions and some say do not do much of anything to promote progress.  To learn more about the conference, check out these two articles from The New York Times and The Washington Post which do a good job of summarizing the meeting’s outcome. 

Another New York Times article relates how the Agreements may provide industrial countries wiggle room to get out of the Kyoto Protocol (the best known protocol of this treaty which was adopted in 1997) at the end of the first phase.  The first phase of the Kyoto Protocol called for industrialized nations to collectively cut greenhouse gas emissions at least 5.2% below 1990 levels between 2008 and 2012.  The second phase is for years 2013 through 2018, and countries are to recommit to new emission reduction goals.   (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol)

V.  The USGBC holds its annual Greenbuild conference in Chicago, IL.

The United States Green Building annual Greenbuild Conference was held in late 2010.  The conference attracted approximately 30,000 attendees and more than 1,800 exhibitors.  As an attendee, some of my key takeaways were:

-Institutional investors recognize the value of green commercial real estate – it is turning the corner from being a niche investment criterion to becoming more mainstream.

-Transparency is increasing in the real estate market.

-Green building technology continues to improve.

-The breadth of green real estate services continues to expand

-The market is beginning to focus on carbon as the metric to define “green.”

What other events in 2010 do you feel have or will have an impact on sustainable real estate practices?

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Sustainability | Comments Off

Communicating through Documents & Deliverables

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010

By Phillip Infelise, Vice Chairman

In our past blog editions, we have covered a range of approaches and services that Project Managers provide.  Now, I think it is time to look at how we (should) communicate with our clients and our project team.  Often it is not what we say, but how we say it.  And written communication, deliverables, and documentation are needed to cover what we are not saying out loud.

Since we have come to accept that very few people ever read lengthy, detailed documentation—we need to adapt to that, and our documents need to catch the eye and focus on only the most important details.  And they must be visually appealing to do that.

-E-mails should be written with all the protocol of a formal letter, not a sound bite.  And the subject line should indicate whether action is needed or simply information is being provided.

-Action Items replace the former laborious Meeting Minutes so team members can focus on only that which is critically important.

-Project Memoranda seem to be a lost art and defers to e-mails, but there are circumstances when a situation or approach should be clarified in this more formal document.

-Deliverables should be boringly consistent – every document should be identical to any prior version.

-Color can be very effective if used appropriately.  Applying red, yellow, green light symbols to Action Items can really grab the attention of the reader to their follow-up needs.

-Complimenting the client by using their logo on documents is a nice touch (make sure your company logo is not bigger or more prominently placed than theirs).

-File Identifiers are important on each document so folks will know where to find it in the electronic archives, often many years later.

-Communicate to the client with commonly used words, not industry-speak.

-Talk less, say more and communicate facts; don’t tell stories just to fill air time.

-Be an Advisor, not a Reporter, as clients needs to know what is coming around the next bend, not hearing what already happened in the last few weeks.

-Phone Conversations is still an important form of communication particularly when sensitive or personal information is forthcoming in a written document and needs prior context.

Many times, a solid document/deliverable can communicate in a graphic way what would have taken thousands of word to describe.  Knowing when to talk and when to document is an acquired skill.

Finally, as a member of our national marketing team, I look at every document we produce as Project Managers to be an opportunity to extend our brand with a consistent identity that is recognizable and replicable.  That is to say, I want each client and project team member to look at a document we produce and immediately know – “that’s a CresaPartners piece.”

In the next blog edition, let’s have a little fun and look at some acronyms and industry speak that baffle our clients.  Maybe we will even make a few 2011 resolutions.

Tags: ,
Posted in Project Management | 1 Comment »

Alternative Workplace Strategies at Work, Part II

Friday, December 17th, 2010

By Robin Weckesser

In Part I of this series, I began talking about a growing trend that I have termed Optimizing Workplace Plans (OWP).  I discussed the three main forces behind this new phenomenon: economy, technology, and culture.  Now, I’d like to focus on the main characteristics of the OWP and how they can work for your company.

New Systems at Work

Tied to these drivers, many companies have implemented new space plans with common characteristics.  These include:

-Smaller workstations.  While the overall footprint per employee is reducing, so is the size of workstations.  Cubicles that have traditionally been 8’ x 8’ are now often 6’ x 8’.  Though smaller, they are designed to be more efficient to encourage interaction and communication, while providing appropriate space for “heads down” work.  They are also relatively inexpensive to install, since the economy has driven down the price of furniture.

-The new cube.  The traditional cubical, with walls on all sides to provide standing privacy and isolation, is evolving.  Now, as the footprint is shrinking, the walls of the personal bunker are coming down and giving way to space that supports team collaboration and interaction.  Still, seated privacy allows for heads down work and a place for personal items.

-Reconfiguration.  To fill empty seats and the associated feeling of being disconnected, Project Managers are consolidating and “restacking” staff in many locations.  This brings employees closer together, and it also may allow companies to sublease the vacated areas, if lease terms permit. 

-Virtual offices.  As stated earlier, the number of remote work settings is proliferating, thanks to broadband wireless for laptops, smartphones, iPads, and virtual webinar meetings.  Today’s “office” may be a den, coffee shop, cafeteria, train, mall, motel, etc. 

-Hotelling.  While there’s still a need for a home office base and group meetings, the idea of one person per cube is yielding to shared space.  With hotelling, employees sign up for office slots, planning their schedules to best utilize time in the office and off-site.  Related to this are new mobile furniture solutions such as file cabinets that allow workers to transport their belongings from place to place while they are on-site.  

-Open spaces, common areas.  Along with cubicle downsizing, tenants are also revitalizing their worksites through spaces that support formal and informal communication, interaction, and knowledge sharing.  Build-outs typically promote comfortable, collaborative work areas; soft seating; and open environments with workstations that allow staff to view the entire area.  Ultimately, the aim is to facilitate communication and create a more enjoyable place to work. 

Tied to the above, more companies are engaging in sustainable practices, which promote healthier worksites and don’t necessarily add additional expenses.  Studies show that going green is another way to improve morale and give companies a competitive edge.

Other benefits of OWP include staff recruitment and retention along with better social networking.  But bottomline savings are cited by most companies as the number-one reason to implement new workplace solutions.  For those companies that might question an initial investment in OWP, it’s hard to argue with increased overall productivity and faster time to market for products.

Boiled down, the workplace is now often viewed as a communication tool that supports a process; that process is product development.

Will It Work for You?

Of course, all new programs come with trade-offs and growing pains, including the reluctance of some senior managers who may have entitlement issues with titles and corner offices.  They may also have concerns about managing remote staff who don’t have 9 to 5 accountability.  To be sure, it’s a new paradigm, and new management skills may be required.  Staff at all levels will need to adjust and strive toward new levels of trust.  This should become easier as new workplace strategies become more mainstream and companies accept the need to focus on the common good.

How, then, should companies get started?  There are various scenarios involving in-house versus outsourced responsibilities and the roles of upfront Strategic Planning and Project Management implementation.  While you will want to conduct your due diligence and review different options, we have found that an advantage of using outside, objective consultants (preferably in a real estate advisory firm that provides fully integrated corporate services) is that it is easier to arrive at consensus. 

In the final analysis, the success of this process depends on how well companies align their workplace strategies with their business plans—and how well plans are executed.  In any event, it may be time to look ahead as the office of the future takes shape today.  Time to embrace this new paradigm I’m calling Optimizing Workplace Plans.  So, consider what’s missing in your workplace…and plan to optimize it moving forward.

Tags: ,
Posted in Project Management | Comments Off

Alternative Workplace Strategies at Work, Part I

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

By Robin Weckesser                                            

The idea of alternative workplace strategies is not new.  But while companies have for some time tried to improve their workflow and reduce expenses, the process and implementation have changed dramatically.  Today, thanks to advanced technology, a cultural shift, and economic conditions that prompt downsizing, more tenants are addressing the physical requirements of their organizations—and in many cases, they are seeking new workplace solutions.

In the San Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley, which tend to be at the forefront of technology and lifestyle trends, more tenants are now planning for the workplace of tomorrow.  In San Francisco, younger generations of web and social/digital-media companies are demanding creative space alternatives.  Throughout the area, start-ups as well as established companies are benchmarking against companies that have saved significantly while also improving their productivity and morale.  Whether companies are renovating existing space or relocating, they need put these concepts to work—and they are often turning to experienced Project Managers for help.

While the conditions still favor tenants in the majority of markets, tenants have an opportunity to exercise their leverage in negotiations with landlords.  This includes pushing landlords to contribute to workplace solutions, especially through tenant improvement allowances.

Indeed, we are witnessing a new wave of organizations that are striving to do more with less.  Which leads me to suggest a new term to describe this growing trend: Optimizing Workplace Plans (OWP).

Drivers at Work

Let’s take a closer look at the forces behind the workplace optimization phenomenon:

-Economy.  Slow job growth, including high underemployment (full-time workers) continues to stall the recovery.  Downsizing continues in many sectors, and this has led to reduced footprints in a majority of offices.  In this environment, where budgetary constraint is still the mantra, there is typically a lack of “buzz” due to so much vacant space.  And while it is challenging for companies to economize and innovate at the same time, we have seen companies accomplish both.  To illustrate the economic impact of OWP, consider that the old model of 300 SF/person is now generally 240 SF/person or less.  This space reduction alone translates into savings of at least 20%.

-Technology.  While the face of the traditional office started to change years ago, what has truly accelerated this transformation are the technological advancements that allow employees to work virtually, anywhere, at any time.  Today, as bandwidth on wireless devices continues to increase, employees typically have at their fingertips all the information they need to be successful out of the office.  At the same time, companies can more easily reduce their square footage—and enhance their bottom line.  In the future, as video becomes more prevalent, virtual presence will deliver additional opportunities.

-Culture.  This is not your grandparents’—or parents’—workplace.  In many organizations, several generations are on the same payroll:  Traditionalists (born before 1945), Boomers (born 1946-1964), Generation X (born 1965-1977), and Millennials (born 1978-1999).  The challenge at work is to address the different styles, values, and expectations—and to find common denominators.  To be sure, Generation X and Millennials are much more comfortable with the digital world, multi-tasking, and electronic communication that frequently preclude the need for face-to-face interaction.  And as use of social media explodes, these generations will continue to drive evolving solutions.

In Part II, I will discuss some of the characteristics of the new space plans that many companies are implementing as a result of these drivers.  Then, I will talk about how OWP can work for your company.

Tags: ,
Posted in Project Management | Comments Off

Truck Drivers Wanted: How a Shortage can Impact Real Estate

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

By Rob Wheeler

An issue that I have been hearing about on a more frequent basis from individuals in the Supply Chain management profession is the pending shortage of truck drivers.  The Council of Supply Chain Management is on record as stating the country will need to hire 200,000 drivers in 2011.  I’ve read articles that state the shortage will be up to 500,000 drivers in 2012.

There are many reasons given for why such a shortage is taking place.  New safety standards such as the U.S. Department of Transportation-sponsored CSA 2010 (Comprehensive Safety Analysis) and an aging truck driver population are the most frequent explanations.  These factors, coupled with normal growth in freight traffic, make sense.  How this shortage trickles through the economy will be interesting to see.  In the near term companies are expecting to pay more for raw materials, commodities, and transportation services as a result of the shortage.  This will ultimately lead to higher prices on the store shelves as well.

What this means for Supply Chain managers is that a new variable has to be considered as part of their overall Supply Chain planning and execution.  Some things to consider:

-          How will a truck driver shortage impact transportation spending?

-          If there are private fleet needs, will labor be available to maintain operations?

-          Will more safety stock be necessary within the Supply Chain to hedge against

potential transportation disruptions?

-          Is inbound transportation spend buried into raw materials cost, and should that be

broken out and renegotiated as independent items?

-          Will a mode shift to air or rail be necessary for some products?

These influences can already be seen in the earnings of rail service providers.  The major Class I railroads are reporting record volumes and profits.  Major investments are being made into the intermodal service offerings they provide customers, with a shift toward regional intermodal service.

As you read through the questions and consider what is going on at the railroads you can begin to see how a truck driver shortage, if long-lived, will impact real estate decisions and could supplant fuel prices as having the greatest impact on operational costs.

Perhaps companies will consolidate into fewer locations in cities with larger working populations where the risk of a disruption in transportation is mitigated.  Railroads could continue to see increases in traffic, so an organization might look to be closer to intermodal facilities to cut down on drayage costs.  One thing is for certain, we will begin to hear more about driver shortages and potential disruptions to commerce in the very near future.  Have you considered this in your strategic planning today?

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Supply Chain | Comments Off

The Role of FM in Renovations and New Construction

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

Jim Ricker color 2006By Jim Ricker

Two areas in which Facilities Management (FM) can add substantial value are the construction of new facilities and the renovation of existing facilities.  Unfortunately, many organizations leave this work solely to design and construction groups, assisted by external planning and design firms.  Yet those corporate real estate (CRE) organizations that do incorporate FM in renovations and new construction often end up with lower costs, better functionality, and higher customer satisfaction than those CREs that segregate FM from the process.

If involving FM brings favorable results, why isn’t it a universal practice?  I’ve heard many reasons over the years:

-FM professionals do not have the educational credentials found in the architectural and Mechincal Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) engineering professions.

-Only highly credentialed professionals should represent the organization when meeting with the external resources.

-FM professionals are good at maintaining but are not qualified to build new space or manage substantial renovations.

-“They can’t be trusted to maintain the corporate standards.”

-Costs and risks associated with this work are beyond the capabilities of many FMs.

-“They’re glorified janitors.  They just don’t get it.”

Most of the above reasons for not including the FM professionals are based on biases related to education and the knowledge and sophistication that comes with a degree.  While no one doubts the value of a good education, this mentality fails to account for the on-the-job knowledge possessed by many veteran Facility Managers.  In my experience, I’ve seen FM professionals correct many planning and design errors—usually after the fact since they were not included in the planning and implementation phases—resulting in cost overruns, occupancy delays, business interruption, and dissatisfaction from the user groups.  Some of these errors have included:

-Inadequate power and cooling in an expanded data center,

-Exceeding floor loading limits,

-Adding full-height offices without adequate cooling,

-Specifying extremely slippery roof membranes for a pitched roof,

-Failing to comply with all relevant codes,

-Delays due to improper scheduling, and

-Failing to plan for critical user needs.

While the inclusion of FM in the planning and design process will not guarantee the elimination of the above problems, my experience is that most of them will not become an issue.  Why?

-FM professionals are responsible for maintaining assets for their useful lives, developing invaluable knowledge about equipment, materials, installation processes, etc.  They know what works and what doesn’t.

-FM professionals know their customers; they know what they really require to conduct business and what they can live without.

-FM professionals communicate with user groups every day and are more experienced than remote organizations in upholding corporate standards due to the level of trust they have developed with their customers.

-FM professionals have to incorporate new and renovated space into their annual operating budgets.  As a result, they know about cost and how to minimize it and can offer beneficial insights into the planning and design processes.

So the next time your organization is about to invest capital into a renovation or new development, take advantage of the experience of your FM team—and expect a better scope of work, lower costs, and more satisfied customers.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Facilities Management | Comments Off

|